Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Bill to let credit unions make more business loans is tabled in USA

Legislation to widen the scope of credit unions to make business loans has been put before the US House of Representatives.

The bi-partisan Credit Union Residential Loan Parity Act would ensure that loans to finance the purchase of small apartment buildings from both credit unions and banks are considered residential real estate loans.

It was introduced on 10 January by US representatives Ed Royce (Republican, California), Jared Huffman (Democratic, California), Don Young (R, Alaska), and Peter DeFazio (D, Oregon).

The bill’s purpose is: “to amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan secured by a non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling from the definition of a member business loan, and for other purposes”.

This would remove such loans from the the member business lending (MBL) cap currently imposed on credit unions. If enacted, the bill would allow credit unions to lend an additional $11bn to small businesses, freeing up much-needed private sector financing for commercial businesses and rental housing.

“The Act unleashes billions of dollars of capital for small businesses at no cost to taxpayers and drives local economic investment,” said Rep Royce.

“Credit unions are vital to local communities and their economies,” added Rep. Huffman. “The Act is a common-sense, bipartisan fix that ensures credit unions are able to do their job and assist small businesses in accessing capital, and making investments in local economies, while boosting the construction and housing sectors.”

“This legislation is good for business and good for consumers,” said Rep. Young. “Not only does it free up capital and expand access to responsible home lending, it provides community lenders with some commonsense regulatory relief.”

Related: Does regulation place an extra burden on credit unions?

“Credit unions should not be constrained by arbitrary regulations that impair their ability to serve members who wish to invest in small residential properties,” said Rep. DeFazio.

The legislation comes as the credit union movement is looking to expand into new areas of business to keep pace with rapid economic, technological and demographic changes.

At the World Credit Union Conference, held in Belfast last July, the sector was urged to take advantage of mobile platforms to reach a younger demographic and expand the range of its lending.

The event also saw speakers lament the regulatory burden on credit unions in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

Bill Hampel, chief economist and chief policy officer of the Credit Union National Association (CUNA), told delegates:““Credit unions are subject to this regulation even through they didn’t engage in such abusive behaviour.”

A survey by CUNA of 53 credit unions from 28 states found that the the regularity burden accounts for 19% of the total operating expenses, leading the organisation to call for more proportionate regulation.