Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Rescoop calls for changes to European Commission’s climate package

The apex wants support measures for renewable communities that focus on energy poverty as a priority

The European federation of renewable energy co-ops, Rescoop, is suggesting a raft of changes to the European Commission’s fit for 55′ package, a set of legislative proposals for a 55% cut in greenhouse emissions by 2030.

The package, which is being debated in the European Parliament and Council, includes plans for a new social climate fund (SCF) to help vulnerable households, micro-businesses and transport users meet the costs of the green energy transition.

But Rescoop, in a recent position paper, accuses the Commission’s proposal of reducing the fund “to a predominantly reactive instrument, aimed at mitigating the distributional impact of an extension of the Emission Trading System to Buildings and Transport (ETS2)”.

The apex points to existing debates around the effect of using price mechanisms to provoke behaviour change, an issue acknowledged in the REPowerEU Plan, and warns that “market-driven savings” may fall short in guaranteeing fairness and solidarity”.

Rescoop argues that while SCF has “significant potential to serve as a cornerstone of a just energy transition, ensuring vulnerable social groups are addressed”, several changes are needed to realise this potential.

It suggests: a more substantial and impactful scope and size for the SCF; delinking the ETS2 as a prerequisite for the creation of an SCF; targeted support for low-income and vulnerable households and their empowerment; and acknowledgment and support for the role renewable and citizen energy communities can play in achieving the objectives of this regulation.

Rescoop also calls on the EU and national governments to provide support through grants, procurement, incentives for vulnerable consumer groups, and dedicated measures to support schemes for renewable energy communities that want to focus on energy poverty as a priority.

The full position paper is available on Rescoop’s website.